<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <!-- These feeds are provided as a helpful resource for persons familiar with this form of technology. 
       We do not offer technical support for web readers, so use them at your own risk.

       To Use: Copy the web address of the feed. Follow the instructions provideed with your RSS feed reader.	 
       SIGIR feeds are as follows:

          Quarterly Reports to Congress   |   http://www.sigir.mil/newsroom/quarterly.xml
          Testimony Before Congress       |   http://www.sigir.mil/newsroom/testimonies.xml
          Lessons Learned Initiative      |   http://www.sigir.mil/newsroom/lessons.xml
   -->
	<channel>
		<title>SIGIR Web Feeds - Testimony Before Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.sigir.mil/reports/testimony.aspx</link>
		<description>SIGIR Testimony</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR)</copyright>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:00:00 EST</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Oversight in Iraq Today (SIGIR 11-004T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified on SIGIR's views on the current state of oversight in Iraq and on ways to improve contingency 
          oversight  in the future.  He supported the idea of a standing, expandable Special Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations as recommended  by the 
          Commission on Wartime Contracting for Iraq and Afghanistan.  He noted that the advantages of such an entity would include quick reaction and continuous oversight 
          at the inception of stabilization and reconstruction operations; cross-jurisdictional oversight; flexibility; experience; and a staff committed to deployment. 
          Staffing for contingencies through a Special IG would improve coordination and complement the work of Departmental Inspectors General while reducing the burden 
          of contingency operation oversight on their staff which has significant, ongoing responsibilities.  A Special Inspector General office would save taxpayers money 
          and improve outcomes.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-004T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-004T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Preserving Progress in Iraq, Part III: Iraq's Police Development Program (SIGIR 11-003T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified about Department of State's Police Development Program (PDP) in the light of SIGIR's October 2011 audit as well as his 
            November 2011 visit to Iraq during which he visited with Embassy and Iraqi government officials to discuss the PDP.  The Inspector General reviewed the 
            history of United States government efforts to assist the Iraqi police forces, which began in 2003.  He noted that SIGIR had completed six audits of U.S. 
            government assistance to the Iraqi police; significant program and contract management problems had been found in the past. The current effort is hampered
            by a failure to assess the state of the Iraqi police and the impact of prior U.S. assistance to it. A proper assessment is necessary to determine what is 
            needed at this stage. In addition, PDP lacks a plan setting out in detail what it intends to accomplish, a comprehensive set of intermediate and longer-
            term milestones, and sufficient measures of program outcomes. The request for an appropriation of $877 million for the PDP in Fiscal Year 2012 is probably 
            in excess of actual needs; the Department of State estimates that it will only require about $500 million to carry out the PDP in the present circumstances; 
            SIGIR believes State has between $200 and $300 million on hand from prior-year appropriations for the PDP.  SIGIR does not believe that the Iraqi government 
            that has "bought in" sufficiently to the PDP; it has not, for example, made any financial commitment to the program, as required by law, and its expressions 
            of support have varied over time.  The Inspector General met with senior staff at the Embassy in Baghdad; those meetings gave him reason to be encouraged by 
            progress made in putting SIGIR's recommendations to the Department into effect.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-003T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-003T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Implementing Improvements to Defense Wartime Contracting (SIGIR 11-002T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified about (a) how the United States could improve defense wartime contracting – explaining 
          and summarizing key results of our audits, inspections, and lessons learned reports; (b) the status of the implementation of SIGIR's recommendations; 
          (c) updated the Commission on trends in SIGIR's criminal investigations, including path-breaking programs such the SIGIR Prosecutorial Initiative; and 
          (d) commented on the Commission's recommendations in its Second Interim Report.  He said:
          
					  I view the Commission's proposal to create “[a] new, dual-hatted position at OMB and the NSC to provide oversight and strategic direction for contingency 
            operations” as a meaningful step in the right direction, but one that would not sufficiently strengthen U.S. management capacities in SROs. The past eight
            years in Iraq demonstrated that high level “coordination” between agencies, and especially between and among State, USAID, and Defense, will not ensure the
            level of integration and accountability required to achieve success in these difficult missions. Moreover, the Interagency Management System within the NSC
            has not proven itself to be an enduring and effective model for managing SRO activities.
            
            The most compelling SRO issue now before U.S. policymakers is not simply the contracting or oversight components of SROs, but how the SRO operations are to
            be planned and managed in toto. A little over a year ago, the Commission convened a hearing with representatives from Defense, State, and USAID, and was
            unable to get a clear answer to the simple question of who is in charge of the Afghanistan reconstruction operation. That salient and disturbing reality
            remains true today. The “whole of government” approach, ostensibly driven by the NSC and OMB, has been largely unsuccessful as an SRO management tool. Experts
            seem to be coming to agreement on this point, and thus the time is ripe for developing and implementing new reforms.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-002T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-002T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>U.S. Military Leaving Iraq: Is the State Department Ready? (SIGIR 11-001T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified about how the mission of the Department of State will change with the impending withdrawal of U.S. military forces 
				from Iraq.  The Inspector General noted SIGIR has uncovered an insufficient focus by program managers on program outcomes and effects.  He expressed 
				concern about whether State could manage large reconstruction projects, such as the Police Development Program, given the problems SIGIR has documented 
				in the past. Specifically, he observed that State must apply the hard lessons learned from previous Iraq experiences, correcting in particular the 
				limited in-country oversight that SIGIR previously identified. He observed that the central questions about Departmental capacities include executing 
				program elements in a post-DoD setting, ensuring adequate oversight, and simply to function in the unpredictable security situation that will exit after 
				troop withdrawal. He recommended that Congress consider conditioning the availability of funds for large programs on the submission by State of a plan 
				describing how it will manage such programs and a certification that it has the resources and personnel in place to manage the activities in question.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-001T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_11-001T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oversight of Reconstruction Contracts in Afghanistan and the Role of the Special Inspector General (SIGIR 10-006T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified on the advantages of Special Inspectors General in the oversight of contingency 
				operations.  Responding to an inquiry in the Chairman’s letter of invitation, the Inspector General noted that it has been difficult for standing 
				Inspectors General to free up and deploy the resources required to deal with contingency operations.  It has also proven expensive and time consuming 
				to establish, staff, and deploy new Special Inspectors General for specific overseas contingencies.  As an alternative, the Inspector General 
				supported establishing a small, standing “Special Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations” (SIGOCO) which would have the task of preparing 
				to quickly expand and deploy auditors, investigators, and other professionals in contingency situations.  With its leadership chosen and procedures 
				established in advance, effective oversight could be provided at the earliest possible moment, saving taxpayer money and helping to assure more 
				effective outcomes.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-006T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-006T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Transition in Iraq: Is the State Department Prepared to Take the Lead? (SIGIR 10-005T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified on the problems that the Department of State will face as it assumes responsibility for overseeing an ongoing 
				assistance program that, while smaller than the Iraq programs of recent years, will still be among the largest State has ever assumed responsibility 
				for.  The problems State will face will be exacerbated by an insecure environment and a lack of information about reconstruction activities previously 
				administered by other government agencies.  SIGIR recommended that (a) State should sharpen its focus on improving its program controls and business 
				practices, including on-the-ground program oversight and contract and grant management; (b) State should conduct an inventory of what has been 
				accomplished in Iraq’s reconstruction thus far and act, as best as it can, to assure tha tour investments are not wasted by neglect in the asset-
				transfer phase or by subsequent neglect to sustain by the Iraqi government; and (c) Congress should continue to focus attention on these questions 
				and closely monitor the plans and actions of State and other civilian agencies.  If resources for improved business practices are required, they are 
				likely to prove to be a bargain compared with waste that may occur if State’s program management and acquisition efforts continue to be under-resourced.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-005T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-005T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Subcontracting in Combat Zones: Who Are Our Subcontractors? (SIGIR 10-004T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General appeared as part of panel examining the problems associated with sub contracting -- and contracting -- 
				in contingency operations.  His testimony noted that government leaders need to take steps to prevent contractors and those layered below them from 
				undermining the government's interests.  Transparency, which might prevent bad practices from occurring, is too often lacking; for example, entities executing 
				government programs have been found to be unable to maintain records as simple as rosters of those employed.  The Inspector General recalled two key 
				recommendations SIGIR has made in the past: the implementation of a "Contingency Federal Acquisition Regulation" and the creation of a new integrated office 
				to manage stabilization and reconstruction operations.  He called for more careful, thoughtful balancing of the benefits of, possibly, contracting to achieve 
				program objectives, and the various risks inherent in the practice of using contractors in a combat zone.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-004T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-004T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How Good Is Our System for Curbing Fraud, Waste, and Abuse? (SIGIR 10-003T)</title>  
			<description>
				On May 24, 2010, SIGIR’s Deputy Inspector General Ginger Cruz and Assistant Inspector General for Investigations Jon Novak testified before the Commission on 
				Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their remarks addressed issues related to general controls over funds and contracting in Iraq and the extent of 
				fraud in Iraq reconstruction program. They also briefed the Commission on the resources and processes SIGIR uses to investigate allegations of fraud, specific 
				cases that have been prosecuted, and reforms that SIGIR believes are needed to prevent and detect fraud in current and future stabilization and reconstruction 
				operations.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-003T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-003T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oversight: Hard Lessons Learned in Iraq and Benchmarks for Future Reconstruction Efforts (SIGIR 10-002T)</title>  
			<description>
				As part of SIGIR’s ongoing effort to ensure that the lessons of Iraq are incorporated into the planning and execution of other 
				stabilization and reconstruction operations (SROs), the Inspector General testified before the House Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights, 
				and Oversight on February 24, 2010.  His testimony focused on SIGIR’s innovative proposal for reforming the U.S. government’s approach to SROs: the establishment 
				of the U.S. Office for Contingency Operations.  Details of this proposal can be found in SIGIR’s fifth Lessons Learned report, Applying Iraq’s Hard Lessons to the 
				Reform of Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-002T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-002T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>An Urgent Need: Coordinating Stabilization and Reconstruction in Contingency Operations (SIGIR 10-001T)</title>  
			<description>
				On February 22, 2010, SIGIR formally presented its report on reforming the U.S. government’s approach to planning for and conducting 
				stabilization and reconstruction operations (SROs) in contingency environments.  Entitled Applying Iraq’s Hard Lessons to the Reform of Stabilization and Reconstruction 
				Operations, this report provides background information on previous attempts to improve the management of SROs, identifies ten specific reforms that could improve the 
				execution of SROs, and proposes a new structural solution that could more comprehensively remedy existing weaknesses in SRO planning and management — namely, the creation 
				of the U.S. Office for Contingency Operations.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-001T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_10-001T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Effective Counterinsurgency: How the Use and Misuse of Reconstruction Funding Affects the War Effort in Iraq and Afghanistan (SIGIR 09-002T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified on how the use and misuse of reconstruction funding affects counterinsurgency efforts in Iraq. Supporting 
				the testimony with findings from SIGIR's 350-page HARD LESSONS report, SIGIR provided key recommendations that can be considered for current and future contingency 
				reconstruction and stabilization operations.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_09-002T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_09-002T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hard Lessons: The Iraq Reconstruction Experience (SIGIR 09-001T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General testified before this legislative-branch commission on SIGIR's latest lessons learned report. The research for Hard 
        Lessons: The Iraq Reconstruction Experience comprised hundreds of interviews with key participants in the reconstruction effort and the review of thousands of documents.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_09-001T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_09-001T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Effectiveness of U.S. Efforts to Combat Corruption, Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Iraq (SIGIR 08-002T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General presented testimony on the effectiveness of efforts by the U.S. to control corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse in Iraq, 
        summarizing the results of SIGIR's efforts over the years.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_08-002T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_08-002T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Improving Contracting and Government Oversight Of Contractors Performing Work In Contingency Operations (SIGIR 08-001T)</title>  
			<description>
				The Inspector General provides observations based on SIGIR's work on contingency contracting and recommends improvements to oversight and 
        contract management in an environment fraught with serious vulnerabilities to waste, fraud, and abuse.  
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_08-001T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_08-001T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Assessing an Effective Diplomatic and Development Program in Iraq: An Examination of the Diplomatic Surge (SIGIR 07-017T)</title>  
			<description>
				SIGIR provides testimony on the effectiveness of reconstruction and development in Iraq as its 15th Quarterly Report is released.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-017T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-017T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Effectiveness of the Provincial Reconstruction Team Program in Iraq (SIGIR 07-016T)</title>  
			<description>
				SIGIR testifies on the release of its third audit of the Provincial Reconstruction Team Program, noting that progress has been made in 
				certain geographic areas and in certain policy domains. However, the planning work recommended in prior audit work has not been accomplished, which limits the effectiveness 
				of the program.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-016T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-016T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Assessing the State of Iraqi Corruption (SIGIR 07-015T)</title>  
			<description>
				The SIGIR provided testimony reviewing U.S. anticorruption assistance in Iraq and assessing the progress the Iraqi government has made 
        fighting corruption -- the "second insurgency" in Iraq. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-015T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-015T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Role of the Department of Defense in Provincial Reconstruction Teams (SIGIR 07-014T)</title>  
			<description>
				SIGIR reports on the development and operation of the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) program in Iraq - a $2 billion 800-person effort. 
				Drawing upon the results of two audits completed in October 2006 and July 2007, SIGIR looks at key operational challenges facing PRTs including staffing, civil-military 
				integration, security, and coordination. We also examine the progress of a civilian surge that aimed to double the number of staff at the 25 PRTs around Iraq, and provide 
				insight into future challenges facing the program.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-014T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-014T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:30:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Costs of Military Operations and Reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan (SIGIR 07-013T)</title>  
			<description>
				SIGIR provides an overview of the $44.5 billion in U.S. funds dedicated to relief and reconstruction programs in Iraq. In addition, SIGIR provides 
				snapshots of recent audits and inspections that examined issues including asset transfer, provincial reconstruction teams, and sustainment. An overview of SIGIR's first focused 
				financial review of Bechtel National Inc. is also provided.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-013T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-013T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>War Profiteering and Other Contractor Crimes Committed Overseas (SIGIR 07-012T)</title>  
			<description>
				SIGIR provides an overview of corruption in Iraq and of U.S. government support for the development of key anti-corruption initiatives in the 
        Government of Iraq. SIGIR also provides an overview of its ongoing investigative work and discusses proposed Congressional legislation on war profiteering.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-012T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-012T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Iraq: Is Reconstruction Failing? (SIGIR 07-011T)</title>  
			<description>
				SIGIR provides an updated assessment from Inspector General Stuart W. Bowen Jr., who recently returned from a 16th visit to 
				Baghdad. In addition to the overview of current reconstruction and oversight efforts in Iraq, SIGIR examines future relief 
				and reconstruction funding and recommendations provided for improved accountability.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-011T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-011T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Contracting in Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR 07-010T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR examines the challenges of contracting in Iraq reconstruction, provides an overview of Lessons Learned and recommendations 
				to improve contracting processes and execution, and presents a series of case studies from SIGIR audits and inspections.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-010T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-010T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Can Iraq Pay for Its Own Reconstruction? (SIGIR 07-009T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR reviews the question of whether Iraq can pay for its own reconstruction. The testimony goes through some of the key variables 
				at play including corruption, budget execution, and Iraqi government capacity and concludes that it will take some time before Iraq 
				has the financial and technical resources to undertake a fast–paced reconstruction on its own.
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-009T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-009T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SIGIR Lessons Learned: Program &amp; Project Management (SIGIR 07-008T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR releases its third and final lessons learned report, focusing on Program and Project Management. Key recommendations include 
				Congressional consideration of a "Goldwater Nichols"–like reform measure to better promote integration among DoD, USAID and DoS; 
				clarifying who is in charge of post–conflict reconstruction; and integrating local populations and practices at every level of the 
				planning and execution process. The full report is found under on the SIGIR Website (http://www.sigir.mil/reports/lessons.aspx). 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-008T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-008T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SIGIR Investigations in Iraq (SIGIR 07-007T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides a high–level overview of its investigative work in Iraq and considers whether enough is being done to combat fraud in 
				Iraq. While SIGIR has found limited examples of outright theft in the U.S. funded portion of the program, waste continues to be a serious issue. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-007T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-007T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Iraq Security Forces (SIGIR 07-006T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR discusses the findings of two audits: an audit of Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) Logistics Plans which found shortcomings in capacity 
				at the Iraqi Ministry of Defense (MOD) and the Ministry of Interior (MOI); and an audit of ISF weapons which found that DoD had not fully 
				complied with a requirement to register the serial numbers of weapons purchased for Iraq. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-006T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-006T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>U.S. Contracting in Iraq (SIGIR 07-005T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides a review of its oversight of the Iraq reconstruction program, including a look at shortcomings in the contract award fee process, 
				the failure to complete construction of 150 planned public health centers, and the problems encountered with the Basrah Children’s Hospital and 
				Baghdad Police College projects. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-005T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-005T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Review of Iraq Reconstruction Oversight (SIGIR 07-004T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides an overview of current and on–going audits, inspections and investigations, lessons learned reports, and discusses its coordination 
				with other oversight organizations in the Iraq Inspectors General Council. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-004T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-004T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>United States’ Involvement in Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR 07-003T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR presents a summary of a 2005 audit of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s (CPA’s) controls over Iraqi funds maintained in the Development Fund 
				for Iraq (DFI). The audit found that the CPA’s internal controls for approximately $8.8 billion in Iraqi money disbursed to Iraqi ministries through the 
				national budget process failed to provide sufficient accountability for the use of those funds. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-003T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-003T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Review of Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR 07-001T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides an update on ongoing and recently completed audits, inspections and investigations of the Iraq reconstruction program. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-001T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_07-001T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oversight Hearing on Reconstruction Contracting in Iraq (SIGIR 06-005T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides details of recently released audits, inspections and investigations with an emphasis on an audit of a contract to provide 150 
				Primary Healthcare Clinics; an audit of the Basrah Children’s Hospital, and summarized the findings of the Contracting Lessons Learned Report. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-005T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-005T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Iraq Reconstruction: Lessons Learned in Contracting and Procurement (SIGIR-06-004T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR releases its second lessons learned report, focusing on Contracting and Procurement. Key recommendations include exploring the creation of 
				an enhanced Contingency Federal Acquisition Regulation (CFAR), creation of a deployable reserve corps of contingency contracting personnel, and 
				pre–competing and pre–qualifying a diverse pool of contractors with expertise in reconstruction. The full report is found under on the SIGIR 
				Website (http://www.sigir.mil/reports/lessons.aspx).  
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-004T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-004T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Review of Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR-06-003T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR reviews significant issues in Iraq reconstruction including the need to improve infrastructure security, close the Reconstruction Gap, 
				and fight corruption. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-003T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-003T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hearing to Examine Iraq Stabilization and Reconstruction (SIGIR-06-002T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides updates on key issues including transition, sustainability, cost–to–complete, anti–corruption efforts, and information systems 
				management.   View the fact sheet (http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-001Ta.pdf). 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-002T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-002T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hearing on Contracting Issues in Iraq (SIGIR-06-001T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides details on its audits of the award of sector design–build construction contracts, the Logistics Civilian Augmentation Program 
				(LOGCAP), the Commander’s Emergency Response Program (CERP) for 2004–5, and contracting processes in South–Central Iraq. Also provided were 
				details of an attestation engagement that examined the award of non–competitive contracts to contractor Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR).   View
				the fact sheet (http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-001Ta.pdf). 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-001T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_06-001T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hearing on Iraq: Perceptions, Realities and Cost-to-Complete (SIGIR-05-003T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR takes a deeper look at the Reconstruction Gap –the difference between the number of projects that the U.S. proposed to build when it 
				first began committing money to reconstruction programs and the number of projects that the U.S. will ultimately complete.  
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_05-003T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_05-003T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oversight Hearing on Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR-05-002T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides an overview of its work to date and presents insight into key issues including cost–to–complete and sustainability. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR-05-002T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR-05-002T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Development Fund for Iraq: U.S. Management of Iraq Oil Proceeds and compliance with UNSCR 1483 (SIGIR-05-001T)</title> 
			<description>
				SIGIR provides a review of its work in Iraq reconstruction with a focus on the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI), its management by the United 
				States, and the four audits done by SIGIR of the management of the DFI. 
			</description>
			<guid>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_05-001T.pdf</guid> 
			<link>http://www.sigir.mil/files/testimony/SIGIR_Testimony_05-001T.pdf</link> 
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
